Appeal No. 95-2976
Application No. 08/041,077
Moreover, since anticipation is the epitome of
obviousness (In re Fracalossi, 681 F.2d 792, 794, 215 USPQ
569, 571 (CCPA 1982)), we will also sustain the examiner's
section 103 rejection of claims 4 through 20 as being
unpatentable over Renner or Renner in view of European '196 or
Renner in view of Carlson and Bahadir and Shiokawa.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007