THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WALTER A. HELBIG
____________
Appeal No. 95-3019
Application No. 08/124,9541
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 2
through 3.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus
for providing access to a computer.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it
reads as follows:
Application for patent filed September 21, 1993.1
2Neither of the Amendments After Final (paper numbers 7
and 9) was entered by the examiner (paper numbers 8 and 10).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007