Appeal No. 95-3056 Application 07/833,718 on large scale was commercially impractical because [of] the instability of hydrated 2-octynyl adenosine when stored (Supp. Ans., p. 2, l. 15-18). We agree with the examiner that the evidence of record, as a whole, strongly suggests that Miyasaka and Matsuda both isolated a hydrate of 2-octynyl adenosine. We also agree with the examiner that the evidence of record, as a whole, suggests that large scale commercial production of the 2-octynyl adenosine isolated by Miyasaka and Matsuda would have been impractical because of its storage instability. However, aside from the teaching in this specification and declarations of record, we find no evidence of record that persons having ordinary skill in the art would have known that Miyasaka and Matsuda isolated a hydrate of 2-octynyl adenosine rather than it anhydrous form. Moreover, even if persons having ordinary skill in the art reasonably would have known that Miyasaka and Matsuda isolated an unstable hydrate of 2- octynyl adenosine, there is no evidence in this record other than that found in applicants’ own specification which reasonably would have suggested to persons having ordinary skill in the art that the water content of the 2-octynyl - 8 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007