Appeal No. 95-3119 Page 4
Application No. 08/089,810
Claims 1 through 5, 7, 9 through 14, 16 through 21 and 27
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Stewart alone, or in view of Rosa.
Claims 6, 15, 23 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Stewart alone, or in view of Rosa as
applied above, and further in view of Hansen and Potinkara.
Claim 22 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Stewart alone, or in view of Rosa as applied
above, and further in view of Korenberg.
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by
the examiner and the appellant regarding the § 103 and § 112
rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No.
17, mailed December 12, 1994) for the examiner's complete
reasoning in support of the rejections, and to the appellant's
brief (Paper No. 14, filed September 6, 1994) and reply brief
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007