THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JOSEPHUS H. EGGEN, JOANNE H. D. M. WESTERINK
and REINDER HAAKMA
________________
Appeal No. 95-3129
Application 07/949,2901
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, COHEN and
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-15, all the claims currently pending in the application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to an apparatus for reading
and playing back information stored on a removable information-
Application for patent filed September 22, 1992.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007