Appeal No. 95-3184
Application 07/981,910
In this light, the examiner’s determination that the method
recited in claim 33, and in claims 34 through 39 which depend
therefrom, would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in
the art in view of Emerson must fall. Accordingly, we shall not
sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of these claims.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007