Appeal No. 95-3194
Application 08/020,232
would have been obvious to the artisan in view of the teachings
of the applied references. Therefore, we sustain the rejection
of claims 16 and 17.
In summary, we have sustained the rejections with respect
to claims 1, 3-6 and 9-17, but we have not sustained the
rejections with respect to claims 7 and 8. Accordingly, the
decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 and 3-17 is affirmed-
in-part.
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007