THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 43
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GREGORY J. ANDERSON and JOHN M. ZIMMEL
____________
Appeal No. 95-3218
Application No. 08/100,6961
____________
HEARD: December 11, 1998
____________
Before WINTERS, JOHN D. SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1 through 11.
1Application for patent filed July 30, 1993. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/918,948, filed July 22, 1992, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of Application No.
07/502,980, filed March 30, 1990, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007