THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DAVID M. REBHAN and DAVID A. WIBBENMEYER
________________
Appeal No. 95-3233
Application No. 08/094,4771
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before CAROFF, KIMLIN and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 3-6
and 10-13, all the claims remaining in the present
application. Claim 10 is illustrative:
1Application for patent filed July 19, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007