Appeal No. 95-3237
Application 08/154,721
Claims 1, 2, 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Hall in view of Bogdanow.
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Hall in view of Bogdanow and further in view of
Luscomb, Locke or McCarthy. Claims 8 and 9 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hall in view of
Bogdanow and further in view of Kellett. Claims 10 and 11 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hall
in view of Bogdanow and further in view of Appellant's admitted
prior art.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and
the Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1 through 3
and 6 through 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The Examiner has failed to set forth a prima facie
case. It is the burden of the Examiner to establish why one
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007