Appeal No. 95-3254
Application 08/029,492
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 to 31, which constitute all the
claims in the application.
Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:
1. A system comprising:
a base portion containing a central processing unit;
a lid portion containing a display coupled to the central
processing unit and a projector for projecting video information
from the central processing unit; and
a hinge connecting the lid portion to the base portion.
The following references are relied on by the examiner:
Rabeisen 4,371,893 Feb. 01, 1983
Maeser et al. (Maeser) 4,803,652 Feb. 07, 1989
Araki 5,091,873 Feb. 25, 1992
Mohler et al. (Mohler) 5,160,919 Nov. 03, 1992
Saito 2 01-237592 Sep. 22, 1989
(Japanese patent publication)
Claims 1 to 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103, in the
following manner. Araki alone is relied upon as to claims 1 to
4, 7, 10, 12 and 14. Araki in view of Maeser is relied upon as
2Our understanding of this reference is based upon a
translation provided by the Scientific and Technical Information
Center of the Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the
translation is enclosed with this decision.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007