THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 47
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HIDEO ITOZAKI, KEIZO HARADA, NAOJI FUJIMORI,
SHUJI YAZU and TETSUJI JODAI
________________
Appeal No. 95-3312
Application 08/167,4371
________________
HEARD: JUNE 8, 1998
________________
Before THOMAS, WEIFFENBACH and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
1Application for patent filed December 14, 1993.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/939,050, filed September 3, 1992, now
abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007