THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL M. CHRYSAM
and TURIDDU A. PELLOSO
__________
Appeal No. 95-3328
Application 07/794,7641
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ELLIS, and WEIMAR, Administrative
Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2
1Application for patent filed November 18, 1991.
According to the appellants, this application is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/665,629, filed March 6,
1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/624,056, filed December 7, 1990, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/410,161,
filed September 20, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007