THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JESSE N. MATOSSIAN, JOHN D. WILLIAMS
and WILFRIED KRONE-SCHMIDT
________________
Appeal No. 95-3366
Application No. 08/113,5501
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 12-16,
20 and 28-36. Claims 25-27 have been allowed by the examiner.
Claims 17-19, the other claims remaining in the present
application, stand objected to as being dependent upon a rejected
base claim. Claim 12 is illustrative:
1Application for patent filed August 27, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007