THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JUERGEN BOECKER, MICHAEL BUTZ, ALFRED FREY,
PETRA HOFMEISTER and HANS SCHMIDT
________________
Appeal No. 95-3460
Application No. 08/042,3031
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before RONALD H. SMITH, SOFOCLEOUS and HANLON, Administrative
Patent Judges.
SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to
17. Claim 18 stands withdrawn as being directed to a nonelected
invention.
The subject matter on appeal is directed to a process for
depositing metallic material onto a substrate.
The reference relied upon by the examiner is:
1Application for patent filed April 2, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007