THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTIAAN P. VAN DIJK and LOWELL D. FRALEY
____________
Appeal No. 95-3500
Application No. 08/065,4381
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before RONALD SMITH, CAROFF and METZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of
claims 1-10, 16 and 20-27, all the claims remaining in the
involved application.
1Application for patent filed May 24, 1993. According to
the appellants, the application is a division of Application
No. 07/762,505, filed September 19, 1991, now Patent
No. 5,245,110.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007