THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte LEONARD W. KOSER,
MARY C. MANGES, FRANCES M. RING,
CYNTHIA A. ROGERS, MICHAEL J. SNYDER,
and, JOHN J. VRIEZEN
_______________
Appeal No. 95-3535
Application 08/095,0331
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 32 through 42, the only claims pending in the application.
The invention is directed to a computer system having a
downward compatibility function. More specifically, a unit of
data from an upper level release computer is allowed to operate
1 Application for patent filed July 20, 1993. According to
appellants this application is a continuation of Application
07/401,210, filed August 31, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007