Ex parte CULP - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-3565                                                          
          Application 08/053,814                                                      

                    Claim 1 reads as follows:                                         
                    1.  A multiresonant traveling wave actuator comprising,           
                    a multiresonant vibrator,                                         
                    a movable object,                                                 
                    a means of providing a normal force to maintain a                 
          contact between the object and the vibrator,                                
                    a controller to electrically activate an                          
          electromechanical transducer, moving the object by traction with            
          negligible contact sliding,                                                 
                   the multiresonant vibrator having at least one                    
          electromechanical transducer having a plurality of layers of                
          independently electrically addressable segments which receive               
          signals from the controller,                                                
                    wherein the segments mechanically frequency sum to                
          produce waves in the multiresonant vibrator, the waves comprising           
          a longitudinal traveling wave having a contact area component for           
          engaging the object and a velocity component for moving the                 
          object at a desired speed.                                                  

                    The examiner’s Answer cites the following prior art:              
          Okumura et al. (Okumura)      4,763,776           Aug. 16, 1988             
          Okuno                         4,857,793           Aug. 15, 1989             
          Kitani                        5,041,750           Aug. 20, 1991             
          Okuno et al. (Okuno) ‘487     60-162487           Aug. 24, 1985             
          (Japanese Patent)                                                           

                                       OPINION                                        
                    The claims stand rejected (1) under 35 U.S.C. § 112,              
          first paragraph, as lacking a written description; (2) under 35             


                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007