THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte OTIS L. FUNCHES, RANDALL D. HAMPSHIRE
and VLADIMIR KOVNER
________________
Appeal No. 95-3570
Application 08/215,1921
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 5, 6 and
9. Claims 7, 8 and 10, the only other claims pending in the
application, stand allowed.
1Application for patent filed March 21, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/738,793, filed July 31, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,305,160,
issued April 19, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007