THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JUN-ICHI NISHIZAWA
____________
Appeal No. 95-3573
Application No. 07/839,7041
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 31
through 37, 41 through 69, 86 and 87.
1Application for patent filed February 24, 1992. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/428,897, filed October 30, 1989, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of Application No. 07/087,974,
filed August 17, 1987, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
Application No. 06/514,594, filed July 18, 1983, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application No. 06/174,725, filed
August 1, 1980, now U.S. Patent No. 4,434,433, which is a
continuation of Application No. 05/878,441, filed February 16,
1978, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007