Ex Parte HEITNER et al - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                     
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                  
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                    
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                
                                                              Paper No. 12           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                  ________________                                   
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                   
                  Ex parte HOWARD I. HEITNER and RODERICK G. RYLES                   
                                  ________________                                   
                                 Appeal No. 95-3647                                  
                             Application No. 08/169,7821                             
                                  ________________                                   
                                      ON BRIEF                                       
                                  ________________                                   

          Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                    
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9.             
          Claims 10-18, the other claims remaining in the present                    
          application, stand withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to          
          non-elected inventions.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                          


               1  Application for patent filed December 17, 1993.                    
                                         -1-                                         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007