THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HIROTAKA FUJISAKI
__________
Appeal No. 95-3742
Application 08/176,2871
___________
HEARD: November 4, 1998
___________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 6. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 25),
claims 1 and 4 were amended, and claims 2 and 3 were canceled.
Accordingly, claims 1 and 4 through 6 remain before us on
appeal.
1 Application for patent filed December 30, 1993. According to appellant, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/847,998, filed April 21, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007