THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RANGASAMY PITCHAI
and
THOMAS S. ZAK
__________
Appeal No. 95-3754
Application 08/138,7801
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before GARRIS, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1-20 as amended
after final rejection. These are all of the claims in the application.
THE INVENTION
1Application for patent filed October 18, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007