THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JAMES P. BAUKUS,
WILLIAM M. CLARK, JR., LAP-WAI CHOW,
and ALLAN R. KRAMER
_______________
Appeal No. 95-3779
Application 08/191,0631
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 15 and 21. Claims 22 and 23 stand withdrawn as
being directed to a nonelected invention.
The invention is directed to an integrated circuit security
system for preventing reverse engineering of an integrated
circuit. More particularly, multiple logic circuits are provided
1 Application for patent filed February 3, 1994. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/923,411, filed July 31, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007