Appeal No. 95-3782 Application 08/048,371 surrounded conductors. The examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of obviousness: Eager, Jr. et al. (Eager) 3,745,231 Jul. 10, 1973 Foster et al. (Foster) 4,895,885 Jan. 23, 1990 Appellants rely on the following references to rebut the examiner’s evidence of obviousness: ASTM Designation: D 4568-86, “Standard Test Methods for Evaluating Compatibility between Cable Filling and Flooding Compounds and Polyolefin Cable Materials,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, pp. 666-670, April 1986; Davis, “A Global Test Method for Long Term Stability of Solid and Foam Skin Insulation,” Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth International Wire and Cable Symposium, pp. 475-476, Nov. 17- 19, 1987. Claims 1-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Eager in view of Foster. We affirm this rejection for reasons which follow. OPINION The article of manufacture recited in appealed claim 1 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007