Ex parte KRISHNAKUMAR et al. - Page 13




          Appeal No. 95-3789                                        Page 13           
          Application No. 08/047,047                                                  


          "final product" as set forth above.  Since the claim is stated in           
          product-by-process format, patentability of the subject matter is           
          considered with respect to other hot-filled container products at           
          ambient temperature and pressure.  Yet one does not know the                
          pressure of the product of the claim as it exists in final form             
          to establish patentability or determine the metes and bounds of             
          infringement.                                                               


          NEW GROUND OF REJECTION                                                     
               Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), we enter the                
          following new ground of rejection.                                          


               Independent claims 15 and 19 and claims 16 through 18 and 20           
          through 22 dependent thereon are rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
          § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to                 
          particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention, for              
          the reasons explained above.                                                


          35 U.S.C. § 103 Rejections                                                  
               Considering now the rejections of claims 15 through 22 under           
          35 U.S.C. § 103, we have carefully considered the subject matter            
          defined by these claims.  However, for reasons stated supra in              







Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007