THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL L. RUBEN
____________
Appeal No. 95-3797
Application 07/975,7641
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1-3 and 5. Claims 4, 6-8 and 9 have
been canceled and claim 10 is allowed.
Application for patent filed November 13, 1992.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007