THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RAJASEKHAR AYALA
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3807
Application 08/088,6961
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 6 through 8, all of the claims
present in the application. Claims 1 through 5 have been canceled.
The invention is directed to a system for selectively retrieving communications from a
plurality of Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) devices placed at different geographic locations
and having corresponding communication addresses.
1Application for patent filed July 8, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007