Ex parte MARKS et al. - Page 1




                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                                                   
                                today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                                                     
                                journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                Paper No. 17                                                                           

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                   Ex parte TOBIN J. MARKS, XINMIN YANG                                                                                                
                                                                   and STANLEY B. MIRVISS                                                                                              
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                        Appeal No. 95-3845                                                                                             
                                                                   Application 08/132,7361                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                                  ON BRIEF                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                     Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                    
                     OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                               


                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow                                                                                                 



                                1Application for patent filed October 6, 1993.                                                                                                         
                     According to appellants, the application is a continuation of                                                                                                     
                     Application 07/969,920, filed November 2, 1992, now U.S.                                                                                                          
                     Patent No. 5,391,793, issued February 21, 1995.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                         -1-1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007