THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte TOBIN J. MARKS, XINMIN YANG and STANLEY B. MIRVISS ________________ Appeal No. 95-3845 Application 08/132,7361 ________________ ON BRIEF ________________ Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow 1Application for patent filed October 6, 1993. According to appellants, the application is a continuation of Application 07/969,920, filed November 2, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,391,793, issued February 21, 1995. -1-1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007