Appeal No. 95-3918
Application 07/971,274
rejection, we make reference to the Examiner’s Answer (Paper
No. 11) and the Appellants’ Brief (Paper No. 10) for the full
exposition thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully reviewed the appellant’s invention
as described in the specification, the appealed claims, the
prior art references applied by the examiner and the
respective positions advanced by the appellant and the
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we have made the
determination that the examiner’s rejection should not be
sustained.
We find that Inaba discloses a disk record container
in which a disk is retained in the container by two
cooperating plates in a sandwich configuration.
Larson discloses a disk cartridge with a base which
is comprised of a plurality of ribs.
Specter discloses a compact disc package having a
well with a diameter which substantially matches that of the
disc so that the disc is snugly received therein.
According to the examiner, it would have been
obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007