Ex parte BLUEMLE - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                  

                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                      
                (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                        
                (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                      
                                                                                                          Paper No. 27                          
                                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                  
                                                             ____________                                                                       
                                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                   
                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                      
                                                             ____________                                                                       
                                                    Ex parte MARTIN BLUEMLE                                                                     
                                                             ____________                                                                       
                                                        Appeal No. 95-3922                                                                      
                                                 Application No. 08/123,5871                                                                    
                                                             ____________                                                                       
                                                    HEARD: January 15, 1998                                                                     
                                                             ____________                                                                       
                Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent                                                                   
                Judges.                                                                                                                         
                JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                     


                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                      
                         This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                                                 
                final rejection of claims 23-26 and 28-41.  Claim 22 is                                                                         
                allowed and claim 27 has been objected to.                                                                                      




                         1Application for patent filed September 17, 1993.                                                                      
                According to appellant, the application is a continuation of                                                                    
                Application 07/705,034, filed May 20, 1991.                                                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007