THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARTIN BLUEMLE
____________
Appeal No. 95-3922
Application No. 08/123,5871
____________
HEARD: January 15, 1998
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 23-26 and 28-41. Claim 22 is
allowed and claim 27 has been objected to.
1Application for patent filed September 17, 1993.
According to appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/705,034, filed May 20, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007