THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER BROWN
and DENNIS PINELLE
__________
Appeal No. 95-3935
Application 08/162,9951
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WEIFFENBACH, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1-9 as amended after
final rejection. These are all of the claims remaining in the application.2
1Application for patent filed December 7, 1993.
2Appellants request in their reply brief (page 3) that claim 8 be canceled as
redundant. No formal amendment to that effect has been submitted by appellants and the
claim has not been canceled. This claim therefore is before us for consideration.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007