THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JAMES E. HALL AND
DAVID M. ROGGEMAN
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4036
Application 08/137,3321
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, METZ, and HANLON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Application for patent filed October 18, 1993.1
According to applicants, the application is a continuation-in-
part of Application 07/995,118, filed December 22, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007