Appeal No. 95-4184
Application 07/813,080
activation of an optional feature. The examiner does not
address the limitations about additional hardware required by
the user's selection of an optional feature. Thus, we
conclude that the examiner has failed to establish a
prima facie case of obviousness with respect to independent
claims 19 and 37. The rejections of claims 19-23, 27-33, and
37 are reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 10 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007