THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 28 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte TOSHIO KOBAYASHI, RYOICHI NAKATANI, HITOSHI NAKAMURA and NORIYUKI KUMASAKA _____________ Appeal No. 95-4189 Application 07/534,8721 ______________ HEARD: DECEMBER 9, 1997 _______________ Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges. WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-6 and 12-25 which are the only claims remaining in the application. We reverse. Application for patent filed June 8, 1990.1 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007