THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROBERT D. ALLEN, RICHARD A. DAY, DONALD H. GLATZEL,
WILLIAM D. HINSBERG, JOHN R. MERTZ, DAVID J. RUSSELL,
and GREGORY M. WALLRAFF
_________
Appeal No. 95-4203
Application 07/793,8891
_________
ON BRIEF
_________
Before DOWNEY, JOHN D. SMITH and GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
1 Application for November 18, 1991. According to the appellants the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/632,032, December 21, 1990; which
is a continuation of Application 07/318,536, filed March 3, 1989, now U.S. Patent No.
5,026,624, issued June 25, 1991; which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/292,173, filed December 30, 1988, now U.S. Patent No. 4,940,651, issued July 10,
1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007