THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PATRICE JUNG and GUY LE BAIL
__________
Appeal No. 95-4344
Application 08/087,0301
___________
HEARD: December 11, 1998
___________
Before FRANKFORT, PATE and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Patrice Jung et al. appeal from the final rejection of claims 18 through 31, all of the claims
1Application for patent filed July 6, 1993. According to the appellants, the application is a
continuation of Application 07/870,101, filed April 16, 1992, abandoned, which is a continuation of
Application 07/615,498, filed November 19, 1990, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007