Ex parte ZOBEL - Page 6




          Appeal No. 95-4359                                         Page 6           
          Application No. 08/041,190                                                  


               perforations.  However, Nawata et al shows a packaging                 
               method comprising packaging the material in a film having 50           
               micron diameter perforations.  See page 1, lines 81-85.                
               . . .  It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill             
               in the art at the time the invention was made to supply the            
               film of Isaka et al with the 50 micron perforations as                 
               taught by Nawata et al to provide low gas permeabilities and           
               control over gas permeability, while maintaining the water             
               transmission, especially since Isaka et al teaches that the            
               size of the perforations should be adjusted to obtain                  
               suitable gas composition inside the package.  Further, the             
               desired number of perforations per area of the film is a               
               function of the particular plant material to be packaged.              
               Isaka et al teaches adjusting the number of perforations to            
               obtain the most desirable gas composition in the package for           
               the particular contents, and the particular number of                  
               perforations depends merely on the contents and the opium              
               atmosphere desired. . . . It would have been obvious to one            
               of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was             
               made to provide the film of Isaka et al with 10-1000                   
               perforations per square meter to provide the best gas                  
               composition inside the package for the particular contents,            
               since applicant has not shown that the particular range of             
               perforations provides any particular advantage.                        


               The appellant argues (brief, p. 5) that a prima facie case             
          of obviousness from the combined teachings of the applied prior             
          art has not been established.  We agree.  It is our opinion that            
          the combined teachings of Isaka and Nawata, relied upon by the              
          examiner, would not have suggested the claimed micron sized                 
          perforations required by the claims on appeal.  That is, the                
          claimed limitation that perforations in the polymeric film have a           
          mean diameter of 20 to 100 microns is not taught or suggested by            
          the applied prior art.  In that regard, contrary to the                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007