Appeal No. 95-4371
Application No. 08/064,440
The following references are relied upon by the
examiner in support of his rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
and 35 U.S.C. § 103:
Rost et al. (Rost) 2,687,209 Aug. 24, 1954
Garden 3,274,707 Sept. 27, 1966
German Patent
(Feighofen) 3 803,689 Apr. 9, 1951
Russian Patent
(Bogomazov) 3 1,668,225 Aug. 7, 1991
The grounds of rejection are as follows:
1. Claims 1, 3 through 7 and 9 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Feighofen (the cited
German reference).
2. Claims 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Feighofen in view of Rost.
3. Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Feighofen in view of Rost and Garden.
4. Claims 17 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Feighofen in view of Bogomazov (the
cited Russian reference).
3Translation attached.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007