Ex parte BLAYNER et al. - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 95-4407                                                                                       Page 5                        
                 Application No. 08/124,834                                                                                                             


                 metal, not that the grain size is more uniform when compared to                                                                        
                 another product.  Furthermore, the appellants have not presented                                                                       
                 any evidence  that would establish that one skilled in the wire4                                                                                                                
                 art would not have understood "uniform" to mean always the same,                                                                       
                 unvarying, without variation.  Accordingly, the specification,                                                                         
                 as originally filed, does not provide support for "uniform grain                                                                       
                 size throughout the metal" (claims 52 and 62).                                                                                         





















                          4Attorney's arguments in a brief cannot take the place of                                                                     
                 evidence.  In re Pearson, 494 F.2d 1399, 1405, 181 USPQ 641,                                                                           
                 646 (CCPA 1974).                                                                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007