THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANK L. GREENWAY
____________
Appeal No. 95-4411
Application No. 08/125,5041
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed September 22, 1993.
According to the appellant, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/914,893, filed July 16, 1992, now
abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
07/380,739, filed July 17, 1989, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/225,070, filed July 27,
1988, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application
No. 06/816,386, filed January 6, 1986, now abandoned, which is
a continuation of Application No. 06/703,221, filed February
19, 1985, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007