THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAVID T. FLOYD
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4477
Application 08/006,3501
______________
ON BRIEF2
_______________
Before: WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge, and
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge and SCHAFER,
Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
The appeal is from a decision of the Primary Examiner
rejecting claims 1-14, 21 and 23-25. We vacate the examiner's
rejection, and enter a new ground of rejection.
Application for patent filed January 19, 1993. The real party in interest is1
believed to be Th. Goldschmidt AG.
Applicant requested oral argument. We are informed, however, that applicant2
orally waived oral argument during a telephone conversation with Administrator Amalia
Santiago. Accordingly, the appeal is being decided on brief without oral argument.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007