THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte LOUISE C. E. COE, LAURA J. ANDERSON,
MARK L. KASPAR, MARY L. McDANIEL, JOHN C. FAISON,
ANDREW E. DIAMOND, MARY C. WANEK, DAVID K. OSTEEN
and KENNETH Y. WANG
________________
Appeal No. 95-4526
Application 08/200,2511
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, STAAB
and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed February 23, 1994.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/980,137, filed November 23, 1992, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/731,589,
filed July 17, 1991, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007