Appeal No. 95-4526
Application 08/200,251
§ 103 rejection of claims 30, 45 and 54 based on Sukiennik,
Nosaki and Sneyd (rejection (d)).
Summary
The rejection of claims 1-10, 25, 26, 28-30, 37, 38, 42-
48, 52-56 and 60-63 as being unpatentable over Sukiennik in
view of Nosaki (rejection (a)) is reversed as to claims 1-3,
25, 26, 28-30, 37, 42-48, 52-56 and 60-63, but is affirmed as
to claims 4-10 and 38.
The rejection of claims 8 and 9 as being unpatentable
over Sukiennik in view of Nosaki and Matthews (rejection (b))
is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 11-16, 18, 39, 49 and 57 as being
unpatentable over Sukiennik in view of Nosaki and Nishino
(rejection (c)) is reversed.
The rejection of claims 30, 45 and 54 as being
unpatentable over Sukiennik in view of Nosaki and Sneyd
(rejection (d)) is reversed.
In each instance, our affirmance is designated a new
ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b).
-18-
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007