Ex parte MIYASHITA - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                                   The opinion in support of the decision                                                                               
                                   being entered today (1) was not written                                                                              
                                   for publication in a law journal and (2)                                                                             
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                               
                                                                                                                Paper No. 18                            

                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                       Ex parte MIYO MIYASHITA                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 95-4545                                                                           
                                                     Application No. 08/0942201                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before THOMAS, SMITH, and CARMIICHAEL, Administrative Patent                                                                           
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                               
                                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                        
                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-4,                                                                     
                 which constitute all the claims remaining in the application.                                                                          
                          Claim 1 reads as follow:                                                                                                      
                                   1. A level shift circuit which drops an output                                                                       
                 voltage of a prior stage circuit to an input voltage level                                                                             
                 required                   at a next stage circuit comprising:                                                                         


                          1Application for patent filed July 21, 1993.                                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007