THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte AMANULLAH KHAN
__________
Appeal No. 95-4550
Application 08/025,9021
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge,
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. No other
1Application for patent filed March 3, 1993. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/686,729, filed April 17, 1991, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007