Ex parte DAVID et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-4587                                                          
          Application 08/121,668                                                      




               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 4-6.              
          Claims 1-3 and 17-22 have been canceled, and claims 7-16 have               
          been indicated as allowable.                                                
               The subject matter of the appealed claims relates to a                 
          method of unitizing and sealing a plurality of containers.                  
          Claim 4 is illustrative of the appealed claims and reads as                 
          follows:                                                                    
               4.  A method of unitizing and sealing a plurality of                   
          containers comprising:                                                      
               placing on each of said containers a double-backed                     
          adhesive tape structure having a first strip portion for                    
          providing one exposed surface with an adhesive thereon and a                
          second strip portion for providing a second adhesive coated                 
          surface that is adhered to said container for sealing said                  
          container;                                                                  
               stacking said containers together with the exposed                     
          adhesive surface of said tape structure on each container                   
          being adhered to at least a portion of the exposed adhesive                 
          surface of said tape on an adjacent container.                              
               Claims 4-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                 
          paragraph, as being based on a non-enabling disclosure.  The                
          examiner urges in support of the rejection that the disclosure              
          is enabling only for claims limited in accordance with the                  
          tenor of the specification to "multipartite" tape structures                

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007