THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte DIETER ROLLER
Appeal No. 95-4605
Application 08/076,2851
ON BRIEF
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed June 11, 1993, entitled1
"Method For Generating Graphical Models And Computer Aided Design
System," which is a continuation of Application 07/525,101, filed
May 17, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/360,494, filed June 2, 1989, now abandoned, which
claims the priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of EPO Patent
Application 89108990.6, filed May 19, 1989.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007