THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 45
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DENNIS L. KRUEGER
and JAMES F. DYRUD
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4633
Application 07/135,0671
______________
HEARD: DECEMBER 9, 1997
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellants’ request for rehearing of our decision of January 27, 1998, wherein we sustained the2
1 Application for patent filed December 18, 1997. According to Applicants, this application is a division of
Application 06/911,394, filed September 25, 1986, now U.S. Patent No. 4,729,371, granted March 8, 1988, which is a
continuation of Application 06/704,537, filed February 22, 1985, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application
06/540,543, filed October 11, 1983, now abandoned.
2 Effective December 1, 1997, 37 CFR § 1.197(b) was amended to change the term “reconsideration” to
“rehearing.” See the final rule notice published at 62 Fed. Reg. 53131, 53197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 O.G. 63, 122 (October
21, 1997).
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007