THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HARALD D. MULLER and YOSHINOBU UEBA
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4716
Application 08/124,2271
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge, and
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
The appeal is from a decision of the Primary Examiner
rejecting claims 11-24 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 over Engler I (U.S. Patent 4,111,857) "in view of" Engler
III (U.S. Patent 4,089,857), Inokuchi (European Patent
Application 0 204 419 published December 10, 1986) and Gemmell
("A Straightforward Approach to the Synthesis of Unsymmetrical
1 Application for patent filed September 21, 1993. Appellants claim
priority based on Japanese application 4-262348 filed September 30, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007